THE REAL DIRT

Solar: The Great Leap Forward

September 14th, 2008 · 5 Comments · Blog

img_0875.JPG

By JAMES WOODFORD

Necessity, as the saying goes, is the mother of invention. As electricity prices soar and fuel prices vacuum-clean cash from our wallets it is going to be interesting to see what new technology hard-pressed humans will conjure.
The mother of them all is nature and the latest solar research coming from institutions like the MIT in the United States is turning to her for answers to how the world might soon be powered.
Deniers like former (praise be to Allah) NSW Treasurer, Michael Costa, talk about how solar-power will never be able to provide the baseload energy necessary to keep our society heaving along.
To run all those squillions of plasma screen televisions, air conditioners and skyscrapers, the argument goes, is beyond the means of solar technology.
We live in a house powered by a collection of seven panels – together the size of a large dining room table – and survive just fine as do many of our friends.
Even without a war-effort investment in technology, a well-designed solar power set-up is pretty damned impressive.
Also, the sun runs our entire planet just fine, maintaining complex natural systems that make all of humanity’s technological advances put together seem like my son’s Lego collection.
Who needs a nuclear power plant as a next door neighbour when a perfectly good one rises in the east each morning then politely and spectacularly excuses itself to the west every night?
To be fair, though, one of the crucial issues with solar is how to keep the electrons flowing when it is dark. In our case we have a battery box on our western veranda that is the size of a chest freezer. Theoretically it has been designed to guarantee electricity to our home for five days and nights of absolute darkness. In other words, think nuclear winter, asteroid strike or the ultimate nuclear accident – our sun dying.
I have to say that our battery box does seem to be very primitive – it is actually nothing more than an elaborate version of the lead acid battery in the average car.
This brings me back to the original point of how energy technology is going to change now that we know coal is ruining the planet and the oil ledger is looking more than grim.
The two big problems with solar seem to me to be making a battery that isn’t a massively expensive bone-corroding toxic soup and working out how to make panels that aren’t dependent on ecologically-damaging silicon mines and processing plants.
At the moment it is true that the maths of installing solar are a bit dubious – the embodied energy in the battery box and the silicon-blue panels is pretty immense.
One of the things that has to happen is for researchers to look to nature to try and better understand how continent sized ecosystems keep themselves fuelled up instead of fouled up.
A team of researchers from MIT in the United States, for example, recently announced they have mimicked the way plants photosynthesise to begin work on a new type of solar battery.
As the scientists reported at the beginning of the month: “Requiring nothing but abundant, non-toxic natural materials, this discovery could unlock the most potent, carbon-free energy source of all: the sun.
“This is the nirvana of what we’ve been talking about for years,” said MIT’s Daniel Nocera the Henry Dreyfus Professor of Energy at MIT.
“…Inspired by the photosynthesis performed by plants, Nocera and Matthew Kanan, a postdoctoral fellow in Nocera’s lab have developed an unprecedented process that will allow the sun’s energy to be used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. Later, the oxygen and hydrogen may be recombined inside a fuel cell, creating carbon-free electricity to power your house or your electric car, day or night.”
Somewhere between the offhanded dismissal by old fashioned deniers and the hyperbole of enthusiastic researchers lies the truth of our solar future. Over the next decade we are going to see spectacular advances in both batteries and panels to the point that these technologies will be embedded into architecture, urban planning and industry. Our dining-room-table sized panels and chest-freezer-box battery bank will one day be seen as a technological oddity – as quaint as an EH Holden.
But no matter what anybody says solar power is the future and more and more often nature will provide the answers we are looking for -after all four billion years of roadworthiness is a pretty good record.

Tags: ··

5 Comments so far ↓

  • Henk Hagedoorn

    A very good rundown of what must happen.
    Our 2 families on two separate properties are fully self sufficient on water and Solar. Have only used our gennie once in 2 years. I must agree that the battery banks holding 3 days in reserve is somehow dounting. Keep up the good work.

  • fiona

    v. interesting…particularly the part about about the new photosynthesis technology

  • Evan

    Detractors that suggest that solar and wind can’t provide ‘base-load’ power have a very poor understanding of the technology and the Aussie electricity market. Peak insolation and average peak wind co-incide very nicely, thankyou very much, with the grid peak (2-8pm).

    Further, it doesn’t matter as much as people think either. Current generation assets don’t actually cover the full peak load. Coal plants are designed to run at their peak efficiency and dislike deviating very much from that. So, they run at slightly less than peak demand and slightly more than overnight demand. The excess gets stored in energy storage devices, like the Bendeela pumping station or Snowy Hydro. Check out this wikipedia entry for more info:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumped_storage
    In short, the technology already exists and some is in place.

    I disagree that solar PV is part of the final solution. PV is still WAY up the cost curve, particularly compared to wind and solar thermal. See page 14 of this report for more info:
    http://www.greenfleet.com.au/uploads/pdfs/McKinsey%20Report%20-%20greenhouse%20-%2015Feb08.pdf

    So, the future I see for Australia is further investment in storage technology and diversified (geographically) solar thermal and wind. Thermal has the advantage of being able to store heat overnight for use later. By diversifying generation it must surely be windy/sunny somewhere.

    Sorry for the long post, just trying to get some info out there.

  • Gillian D

    Don’t forget wave energy – see, for example, the Carnegie Corp CETO plant in WA link http://www.carnegiecorp.com.au/
    The benefits of this system is that you can use the mechanical pumping power of the waves to push salt water through reverse osmosis filters, thus desalinating seawater without using electricity. Alternatively, you can use the pumped water to drive turbines and generate power. The buoys that do the work are underwater, so don’t affect the view. Could be suitable for any moderately high energy wave environment and , because they extract energy from the waves, they would help protect shores that are vulnerable to increased wave energy as a result of climate change – sound like win-win to me! And, no, I am not a publicist for the company, just think it’s a great idea!

  • allan kessing

    There is a serious disconnect in the alt-energy debate to which you allude above re a/c, plasma screens & other 21C toys . I couldn’t believe a letter in one of the old grey-green mags, Grassgarden or Earthroots I forget which (both have become parodies of their 70s cop-out) whining that their solar array wouldn’t power their dryer and vacumm cleaners.
    Life is about energy, not electricity. To use electricity for HEAT (cooking, hot water or a/c )is utterly insane given the thermodynamic deficit, roughly a third at each step. It should be used only for electronics or motive power. For all other purposes there are simple, cheap and more than adequate alternatives.
    Evan above cites the Snowy pump & generate system, 2hich is 19thC technology and none the worse for that. It is the perfect storage for energy, able to be converted at will into electricity or directly to torque or anything else as required.
    The other great neglected energy source going to waste is methane, currently endangering a housing estate in Victoria, but usually just seeping into the atmosphere where it is orders of magnitude more damaging than CO2 as a greenhouse amplifier.

Leave a Comment